Nguồn gốc:
Trung Quốc
Hàng hiệu:
YUHONG
Chứng nhận:
ASME VIII Div. 1, PED/97/23/CE, TEMA R, TEMA C, TEMA B
Số mô hình:
Loại AES
Desalted Crude Oil Side Draw Heat Exchanger (TEMA AES) for Petrochemical Industry
| Type | Description | Mnemonic / Visual Concept | Key Advantages | Key Disadvantages | Best Applications |
| A | Channel and Removable Cover | A = Access | Easiest to clean the inside of the tubes. You only need to remove the flat cover without disconnecting the tube-side piping. | More flanged joints (two), increasing the potential risk of external leakage under high pressure. Higher manufacturing cost. | Services with highly fouling tube-side fluids that require frequent mechanical cleaning (brushing). |
| Features two flanged joints; the channel cylinder and the flat cover are independent. | |||||
| B | Bonnet (Integral Cover) | B = Bonnet | Fewer flanged joints mean better sealing performance, lighter weight, and lower cost. | To clean the inside of the tubes, the entire bonnet must be disconnected and removed from the piping. | Clean tube-side fluids, high-pressure services, or applications where frequent internal cleaning is not required. |
| The channel and cover are fabricated as a single piece (domed head), leaving only one flanged joint. | |||||
| C | Channel Integral with Tubesheet | C = Combined | Eliminates the flanged joint between the tubesheet and channel, minimizing external leakage risks under extreme pressure. | Higher cost; if the tube bundle fails, it cannot be pulled out as a single assembly for complete replacement. | High-pressure, hazardous, lethal, or toxic fluids where tube-side mechanical cleaning is still necessary. |
| The channel is welded or forged integrally with the tubesheet, but the flat cover is removable. | |||||
| N | Channel Integral with Tubesheet and Cover | N = No Flanges | Most compact design with the lowest risk of external leakage (near zero). Highly resistant to extreme pressure. | Mechanical brushing is impossible. Can only be cleaned using chemical circulation (Chemical Cleaning). | Severely hazardous, lethal, explosive, or ultra-high pressure services with extremely clean fluids. |
| The cover, channel, and tubesheet are completely welded together into a single rigid structure. |
| Type | Description | Mnemonic / Visual Concept | Key Advantages | Key Disadvantages | Best Applications |
| E | One-Pass Shell | E = Everyday (Standard) | The most classic, simple, and cost-effective design. Offers flexible baffle configurations. | High pressure drop (resistance) when handling massive volumetric flow rates or gases. | The most common choice for general liquid-to-liquid heat transfer with moderate temperature differences. |
| One inlet and one outlet. Fluid flows along the shell length guided by baffles. | |||||
| F | Two-Pass Shell with Longitudinal Baffle | F = Flip (Divided Flow) | Forces the shell-side fluid into two passes, achieving true counter-current flow. Maximizes MTD and efficiency. | The internal longitudinal baffle requires high manufacturing precision; risk of thermal bypassing/leakage across the baffle under high pressure differentials. | Applications requiring high thermal efficiency, close temperature approaches, or a pure counter-current flow pattern. |
| Features an internal longitudinal baffle that forces the fluid to travel back and forth. | |||||
| G | Split-Flow | G = Grand Split | Splits the flow to significantly reduce shell-side pressure drop. Ideal for phase-change services. | More complex internal structure and piping layout. | Commonly used for reboilers or services involving partial condensation. |
| Central inlet split into two streams by a horizontal baffle, exiting at the ends. | |||||
| H | Double Split-Flow | H = Huge Split | Offers an even lower pressure drop than the G-shell and provides highly uniform heat transfer coefficient distribution. | Complex fabrication and internal baffle alignment, resulting in higher costs. | Large-duty reboilers or evaporation processes requiring minimized pressure drop. |
| An upgraded version of the G-shell, using multiple baffles to split the flow into four streams. | |||||
| J | Divided-Flow | J = Joint (1-in/2-out or 2-in/1-out) | Reduces the pressure drop to approximately 1/8 of an E-shell, allowing massive gas volume throughput. | Requires piping connections at both ends of the shell, complicating external piping layouts. | Large-volume gas cooling or vacuum condensers where pressure drop must be strictly minimized. |
| Typically enters at the center and exits at both ends (inverted T-shape). | |||||
| K | Kettle Type Reboiler | K = Kettle (Enlarged Shell) | Provides an integrated vapor-liquid separation space. Vapor rises smoothly while liquid is boiled below, preventing liquid entrainment. | The oversized, kettle-shaped shell is bulky, consumes more material, and is expensive. | Distillation tower reboilers, evaporators, and waste heat boilers in chemical plants. |
| The tube bundle sits in the lower section, while the upper shell features a distinct enlarged vapor space. | |||||
| X | Cross-Flow | X = Cross- (Pure Cross Flow) | Fluid passes straight through without bending, resulting in virtually zero pressure drop (no baffle resistance). | High risk of flow-induced tube vibration; requires a massive impingement plate at the inlet. | Large-scale power plant condensers, geothermal power, or ultra-high velocity gas condensation. |
| Fluid enters across the entire top length and exits through the bottom, flowing perpendicularly over the tubes. |
| Type | Category | Mnemonic / Visual Concept | Thermal Expansion Solution | Bundle Removable? | Key Pros & Cons / Best Applications |
| L | Fixed Tubesheet | Mirrors Front Head 'A' | Rigid design. If the temperature difference is large, an expansion joint (bellows) must be added to the shell. | No | Pros: Very easy to remove the flat cover and clean the tube inside; economical. |
| Features a flanged flat cover. The tubesheet is welded directly to the shell. | |||||
| M | Fixed Tubesheet | Mirrors Front Head 'B' | Rigid design. Requires a shell expansion joint for high temperature differentials. | No | Pros: Fewer flanged joints, better high-pressure sealing than Type L. |
| Features an integral bonnet (domed head). The tubesheet is welded to the shell. | |||||
| N | Fixed Tubesheet | Mirrors Front Head 'N' | Rigid design. Requires a shell expansion joint for high temperature differentials. | No | Pros: Lightest weight, absolutely zero risk of external flange leakage. |
| Completely welded on both ends; no large-diameter body flanges. | |||||
| P | Packed Floating Head | P = Packed (Inside Packing) | The tubesheet slides freely, perfectly absorbing thermal expansion. | Yes | Critical Flaw: Packing degradation can cause internal fluid intermixing (cross-contamination) between tube and shell sides. |
| The rear tubesheet slides inside the shell, sealed by a soft packing ring. | |||||
| W | Packed Floating Head | W = Warning Lantern Ring | The tubesheet slides freely, perfectly absorbing thermal expansion. | Yes | Pros: Any leakage drains out through the weep holes, preventing internal cross-contamination. |
| The tubesheet slides, but features a tell-tale weep hole between the tube/shell packings. | |||||
| S | Floating Head | S = Split Ring | The rear head floats freely inside the shell cover, eliminating thermal stress. | Yes | Pros: The refinery workhorse. Allows thorough mechanical cleaning of both tube inside and outside. |
| The classic floating head. The floating head cover is secured to the tubesheet using a split backing ring. | |||||
| T | Floating Head | T = Total Pull-Through | The rear head floats freely inside the shell cover, eliminating thermal stress. | Yes | Pros: Fastest bundle extraction; drastically reduces maintenance downtime. |
| The floating head cover diameter is smaller than the internal shell diameter. | |||||
| U | U-Tube | U = U-Tube (Bending) | The bent end hangs completely free, allowing unhindered thermal expansion. | Yes | Pros: Eliminates half the tubesheets, headers, and flanges. Highly cost-effective and exceptional for high pressure. |
| Tubes bend 180 degrees. No rear head or rear tubesheet exists. | (Immediate pull from the front side) | Cons: U-bends cannot be cleaned mechanically. Tube-side fluid must be extremely clean and non-fouling. |
Gửi yêu cầu của bạn trực tiếp đến chúng tôi
english
français
Deutsch
Italiano
Русский
Español
português
Nederlandse
ελληνικά
日本語
한국
polski
فارسی
বাংলা
ไทย
tiếng Việt
العربية
हिन्दी
Türkçe
indonesia
Đánh giá chung
Ảnh chụp nhanh về xếp hạng
Sau đây là phân phối của tất cả các xếp hạngTất cả các đánh giá